ARIN-PPML@Apr 4, 2009

Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 14:45:55 -0700
From: Scott Leibrand
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] The AC has a job to do with 2009-1, can you
please help?
To: Leo Bicknell
Cc: ARIN PPML
Message-ID: <7A0D01B5-8A60-450F-B22E-2E1261907ACF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes

That seems like a good way to restore the original sunset date, which
would've been 3 years from IANA exhaustion if the Board hadn't found
it necessary to implement 2008-6 beforehand.

-Scott

On Apr 4, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:

> In a message written on Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 11:04:58AM -0700, Owen
> DeLong wrote:
>> While I am one of the strongest supporters of the sunset clause idea,
>> I think that 2010 would be far too early. IANA runout will probably
>> occur
>> somewhere in 2010-2011. I think that we will need at least 2-3
>> years of
>> this policy after that date for it to be at all meaningful. Would
>> you
>> accept a 12/31/2013 date?
>
> I'm thinking outloud, so I'm not sure I'd support this myself, but
> what about making the run-out date "3 years after IANA has handed
> out the last /8"?
>
> That way we don't have to guess at when we're out of space now with a
> fixed date.
>
> --
> Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
> PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/


2009-1の議論でIPv4枯渇(Sunsetと呼称)の時期についても議論中。
2008-6と密接に関ってくる。