ARIN-ppml@Mar 26, 2009

Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:13:18 -0500
From: "Kevin Kargel"
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2009-1: Transfer Policy (Using
theEmergency PDP)
To: "PPML ppml"
Message-ID: <70DE64CEFD6E9A4EB7FAF3A06314106601B4AF23@mail>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net] On
> Behalf Of John Curran
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 6:16 PM
> To: arin-ppml@arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2009-1: Transfer Policy (Using
> theEmergency PDP)
>
> All -
>
> As noted in Daniel's message, the material change made to the
> transfer policy by the ARIN Board is removal of the 3 year
> sunset clause. It was the consensus of the Board that this did
> not materially improve the usefulness of the 2008-6, created
> uncertainty for the community, and most importantly represented
> a dangerous precedent of time-based expirations of policy clauses.
>
> At present, the Board has one tool at its disposal for timely
> modification of policy language, and that is use of the emergency
> policy process. The Board has already indicated the urgent need
> for a transfer policy and due to the timeliness of the situation,

What urgent need for a transfer policy? Why does this keep getting restated
as though it is established fact. I have not seen a community consensus
that there is a need for a transfer policy. There are a few vocal
individuals that voice the need for a transfer policy until some accept it
as fact.

There is no need for a transfer policy. We have a policy for reassignment
of IP blocks. We do not need a new policy unless the goal is to make profit
from the transfer.

Kevin


既にIPv4再アサイン規定があるのに急いでIP移転ポリシーを決めるのはどうして？
というコメント。
どうもARIN ACは急いで決めたがっているように(外野からは)見受けられる。
さらに。


Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Lee Howard
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2009-1: Transfer Policy (Using
the Emergency PDP)
To: Leo Bicknell , arin-ppml@arin.net
Message-ID: <829182.10675.qm@web63307.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii



As a Board member, I have some insight into the process by which the
emergency draft policy was submitted to the community. However, I am
not willing to discuss the Board's deliberations without checking with my
fellow Board members; I'm afraid of mischaracterizing their positions. I
do have my own opinions, which I will share, but I have an open mind,
and it can be changed by well-reasoned argument or correction of my
faulty memory.

The Board tries to stay out of policy matters, having created the Advisory
Council for that purpose. Generally I am reluctant to advocate for or
against potential policies. In this case, there's a policy gap, where
numbers could be better allocated as needed, per ARIN's mission.


ARIN Boardからも強烈な懸念が。