3/18/2009

RIPE-ipv6-wg@Mar 17, 2009

Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:40:33 +0100
From: "Peeters, Ralph"
To:
Subject: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 questions regarding ripe and address ranges

Hello,


My name is Ralph and i'm researching the options for IPv6 within my
company. From previous contact with the ripe i've understood that there
are 3 ways to get IPv6 ranges:
- ISP assigned, i don't like this option because of renumbering issues
when transferring to a different ISP
- Ripe member, this way my organisation will become a member and can
request own adresses based upon need
- PI assigned, coming (hopefully) this year


My company has several locations on several continents, which raises the
following questions:
-If we would become a ripe member, how would we deal with IPv6 range
requests outside the ripe "juristiction", like in north america?

-It is my understanding that the ripe member policy assigns /32sh and no
/48sh which, from my standpoint, seems a bit unnecessary because there
will be equal number of routing entries because we will require one
range per location no matter the prefix. From what i've learned so far
this could basically result in a /32 for a 100-user location which
cannot be the goal, even though i might be stuck in IPv4 ways.


- Isn't it possible to get a /32 and allow us to divide it between our
sites with /48sh (and allowing them to advertise /48sh globally)?


Sincerely,
Ralph Peeters


This message and attachment(s) are intended solely for use by the addressee
and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise
exempt from disclosure under applicable law.

If you are not the intended recipient or agent thereof responsible for deli
vering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strict
ly prohibited.

If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
immediately by telephone and with a 'reply' message.

Thank you for your co-operation.


やはりIPv6が普及するにつれてIPv4の普及期と同じ動きが出てくる。
それは企業によるIPv6アドレスブロック確保。
単にリナンバしたくないという理由以上の思惑が見え隠れする気がする。

0 件のコメント:

コメントを投稿